Smart intercom systems have become a must-have for modern properties—from luxury apartment complexes to office buildings. Among the top contenders are ButterflyMX and 2N, two of the most trusted names in the industry. But how do they really compare when it comes to features, pricing, and usability?
In this review, we’ll dive deep into both platforms to help you decide which is the better fit for your property.
1. Company Background
- ButterflyMX → Founded in 2014, ButterflyMX focuses heavily on cloud-based, app-driven intercom solutions for multi-family housing and commercial spaces.
- 2N → A Czech-based company with a strong reputation in Europe and the U.S., 2N offers a wide range of IP intercoms, access control, and VoIP solutions, making it popular for both residential and enterprise use.
2. Hardware & Installation
- ButterflyMX
- Sleek touchscreen panels (7”–11”).
- Primarily wireless and cloud-based, making it easier for retrofits.
- Minimal wiring needed, cutting down on installation costs.
- 2N
- Wide product range: IP Verso, IP Base, and indoor panels.
- Often requires hardwired connections, which means higher upfront installation costs but more robust reliability.
- Ideal for new builds or tech-heavy properties.
Verdict → ButterflyMX wins for easy installation; 2N shines in customisation and wired reliability.
3. Features & Functionality
- ButterflyMX
- App-based access for tenants.
- Virtual keys (PINs, QR codes) for deliveries.
- Visitor logs with photos.
- Cloud management dashboard for property managers.
- 2N
- Modular design → Add cameras, RFID readers, Bluetooth, or keypads.
- SIP & VoIP support → Great for office environments.
- Wide integration support (Crestron, Control4, etc.).
- Flexible hardware for multi-use cases.
Verdict → ButterflyMX is more tenant-friendly, while 2N is highly customisable for enterprise setups.
4. Audio & Video Quality
- ButterflyMX → HD video with night vision, but depends on Wi-Fi/cloud connection. Occasional lag if network isn’t strong.
- 2N → Wired Ethernet or PoE ensures crisper video & more reliable audio, even in poor internet conditions.
Verdict → 2N edges out ButterflyMX in terms of raw audio/video reliability.
5. Mobile App & User Experience
- ButterflyMX
- Clean, modern mobile app.
- Tenants love its simplicity—answer calls, grant access, and view logs from anywhere.
- Ideal for tech-savvy residents.
- 2N
- App works well but less polished.
- Stronger appeal for facility managers and IT teams.
Verdict → ButterflyMX wins on user-friendliness; 2N feels more enterprise-grade.
6. Pricing & Value
- ButterflyMX
- Hardware starting around $3,000–$7,000 depending on unit size.
- Subscription fees for cloud service (~$15–$25 per unit monthly).
- Affordable for multi-family landlords seeking scalability.
- 2N
- Wide pricing range depending on modules (~$1,200–$8,000+).
- Fewer recurring subscription fees—more upfront investment.
- Better suited for properties that prefer CAPEX over OPEX.
Verdict → ButterflyMX suits those who want lower upfront costs but don’t mind subscriptions; 2N works for those who prefer one-time investments.
7. Ideal Use Cases
- ButterflyMX
- Apartment buildings & condos.
- Student housing.
- Commercial properties with multiple tenants.
- 2N
- Enterprise offices.
- Luxury residential complexes.
- Properties needing custom hardware integrations.
Final Verdict
Both ButterflyMX and 2N are excellent smart intercom solutions, but your choice depends on your priorities:
- Choose ButterflyMX if you want:
- Easy installation & cloud-first system.
- Tenant-focused features (apps, QR codes, visitor photos).
- Lower upfront costs with manageable subscription fees.
- Choose 2N if you want:
- Robust wired reliability.
- Modular hardware and deeper integrations.
- Enterprise-level scalability without ongoing monthly fees.
👉 In short, ButterflyMX = convenience & simplicity, while 2N = flexibility & enterprise control.